Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

An ecological restoration assessment integrating multi-criteria decision analysis with landscape sensitivity analysis for a hydroelectric power plant project: the Tokat-Niksar case

  • Published:
Save article
View saved research
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Due to Turkey’s reliance on imported electricity, it has been using hydroelectric power plants (HPPs) to cover some of its electrical energy needs since 2011. However, HPP projects, which do not take landscape sensitivity into account, cause the ecological integrity of the basins and the ecosystem structure to deteriorate. This study presents the Tokat-Niksar HPP project field example in Turkey’s Central Black Sea region with its steep slopes, rich forest and creek vegetation, protected endemic plants and wildlife, cultural heritage dating back to 3000 BC agricultural activities, and long-established local culture. The study, in fact, aims to develop a landscape restoration plan that considers the sensitivity of landscapes in the HPP project area. For this purpose, a landscape sensitivity analysis consisting of water, habitat, visibility, erosion functions, and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) determining priority of functions conducted with experts were performed. According to the results, the water function was found to have the highest, and the visibility the lowest priority in the ranking. Consequently, 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th-degree sensitive areas with very high, high, and moderate landscape sensitivity were determined by weighted sum function by considering the priority of each landscape function, and accordingly, a five-stage landscape restoration model was developed including soil protection, areas to be protected, erosion control, vegetation screening, and creek reclamation. This study presents a framework for sustainable landscape restoration solutions in the town by combining landscape sensitivity analysis via MCDA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request available at sara.demir@btu.edu.tr.

References

  • Akayezu, P., Musinguzi, L., Natugonza, V., Ogutu-Ohwayo, R., Mwathe, K., Dutton, C., & Manyifika, M. (2020). Using sediment fingerprinting to identify erosion hotspots in a sub-catchment of Lake Kivu. Rwanda. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 192(12), 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Andolina, C., Casale, C., Cingotti, M., & Savio, S. (2020). Visual compatibility of wind power plants with the landscape: Possible methods for preliminary assessment. In Wind energy and landscape (pp. 31–42). CRC Press

  • Aslan, H., & Soguksulu, S. (2017). Run of river hydroelectrical power plants (HPPs)’s caused problems and studies of rehabilitation: Sample of Trabzon City. KSU J Nat Sci., 20(1), 67–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks-Leite, C., Ewers, R. M., Folkard-Tapp, H., & Fraser, A. (2020). Countering the effects of habitat loss, fragmentation, and degradation through habitat restoration. One Earth, 3(6), 672–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bobat, A. (2017). Environmental ımpact assessment of hydropower projects in Turkey: Applications and problems. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 26(2), 1192–1200

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buuren, M. (1994). The hydrological landscape structure as a basis for network formulation: A case study for the Regge Catchment (NL). Landscape Planning and Ecology Networks, Elsevier Science B.V., The Netherlands

  • Chazdon, R. L., Wilson, S. J., Brondizio, E., Guariguata, M. R., & Herbohn, J. (2021). Key challenges for governing forest and landscape restoration across different contexts. Land Use Policy, 104, 104854

  • da Silva, A. L., de Nunes, A. J. N., Marques, M. L., Ribeiro, A. Í., & Longo, R. M. (2021). Assessing the fragility of forest remnants by using landscape metrics. Comparison between river basins in Brazil and Portugal. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 193(4), 1–17

  • Demir, S. (2019b). Determining suitable ecotourism areas in protected watershed area through visibility analysis. Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology, 20(1), 214–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Demir, M., Irmak, M., Yılmaz, H., & Karadeni̇z, T. (2017). Evaluation of landscape restoration process in damaged areas during the construction of hydroelectric power plants in the sample of Kabaçağlayan Waterfall. Turkish Journal of Forestry, 18(1), 63–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Demir, S. (2019a). Landscape dynamics changes of the protected Mary Valley, Turkey. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 17(2), 3591–3613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demir, S., & Atanur, G. (2019). The prioritization of natural-historical based ecotourism strategies with multiple-criteria decision analysis in ancient UNESCO city: Iznik-Bursa case. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 26(4), 329–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dirik, H. (1990). Planting shock. Journal of the Faculty of Forestry Istanbul University, 40(3), 105–116

    Google Scholar 

  • GDF. (2020). General Directorate of Forest. Visibility analysis [Internet]. [citied 2020 December 18]. Available from https://www.ogm.gov.tr/ekutuphane/EgitimDokumanlari/GorunurlukAnalizi.pdf 

  • GDHW. (2020). General Directorate of State Hydraulic Works. 2020. Graph of the development state of the hydroelectric energy potential [Internet]. [citied 2020 December 18]. Available from https://enerji.dsi.gov.tr/Duyuru/Detay/842

  • GEZI. (2020). Gezi regulator and HPP Project Landscape Repair Plan Report. 2015. Ordu Origin Project [Internet]. [citied 2020 December 16]. Available from http://orijinpeyzaj.com/hizmetler

  • Kurdoglu, O., & Ozalp, M. (2010). Evaluation of river type hydroelectric power plants in the context of legal course, environmental ımpacts, nature conservation and ecotourism, III. National Black Sea Forestry Congress, Proceedings Book. 2, 688–707

  • Leitão, A. B., & Ahern, J. (2002). Applying landscape ecological concepts and metrics in sustainable landscape planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 59, 65–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, X., Zhang, Y., Lin, Y., Zhang, S., & Zhao, Q. (2019). Island soil quality assessment and the relationship between soil quality and land-use type/topography. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 191(4), 1–16

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • LUC. (2017). Land Use Consultant. 2017. Dartmoor landscape sensitivity assessment: The sensitivity of land around key settlements, Final Report [Internet]. [citied 2020 december 10]. Available from https://www.dartmoor.gov.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0032/87197/Dartmoor-LSA-FINA-web-1-16.pdf

  • MAFT. (2014). The Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry of Turkey. 1:25 000 topographic map, geology map, soil map; and forest management plan. Ankara-Turkey

  • Manolaki, P., Zotos, S., & Vogiatzakis, I. N. (2020). An integrated ecological and cultural framework for landscape sensitivity assessment in Cyprus. Land Use Policy, 92, 104336

  • McGarigal, K., & Marks, BJ. (1994). Fragstats: Spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-351

  • McHarg, I. (1969). Design with nature. The Natural History Press

    Google Scholar 

  • MEUT. (2020). The Ministry of Environment and Urbanization of Turkey. Report of the environmental impacts of hydroelectric power plants [Internet]. [citied 2020 december 15]. Available from https://webdosya.csb.gov.tr/db/ced/editordosya/.pdf

  • Mohamed, A. H., Shendi, M. M., Awadalla, A. A., Mahmoud, A. G., & Semida, W. M. (2019). Land suitability modeling for newly reclaimed area using GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 191(9), 535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okatan, A., & Demirel, D. (2014). Tokat/Niksar Kaynar regulator and HPP. Ilmur Energy Project Report, Ministry of Environment and Urbanization Press

  • Ozdemir, H. (2007). Application of SCS CN rainfall-runoff modeling using GIS and remote sensing: A case study of Havran river basin (Balıkesir). Journal of Geography, 5(2), 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozhanci, E., & Yilmaz, H. (2018). Sensitivity analysis in landscape ecological planning; the sample of Bayburt. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 32(2), 77–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, M. R., Shi, Z. H., & Chongfa, C. (2014). Assessing regional environmental quality by integrated use of remote sensing, GIS, and spatial multi-criteria evaluation for prioritization of environmental restoration. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 186(11), 6993–7009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1, 83–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Safaei, M., Bashari, H., Mosaddeghi, M. R., & Jafari, R. (2019). Assessing the impacts of land use and land cover changes on soil functions using landscape function analysis and soil quality indicators in semi-arid natural ecosystems. Catena, 177, 260–271

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sahin, S., Yenil, H. U., & Yilmaz, F. C. (2014). The landscape development plan within hydroelectric power plants. Turk J Sci Rev., 7(1), 52–57

    Google Scholar 

  • SLA. (2015). Sensitive landscape areas. Background Paper, East Ayrshire Local Development Plan [Internet]. [citied 2020 december 10]. Available from https://www.east-ayrshire.gov.uk/Resources/PDF/L/LDP-Sensitive-Landscape-Area-Background-Paper.pdf

  • Turhan, E., Cagatay, H., & Kececi, A. (2015). Environmental and social effects of hydroelectric power plants (HEPP): Alakır Valley Example. 4th Water Structures Symposium of UCTEA Chamber of Civil Engineer, 67–77

  • Uzun, S., Kaya, S., & Gultekin, P. (2018). Assessment of natural landscape elements for camp and picnic areas site selection: Example of Duzce Topuk Plateau. Duzce University Journal of Science and Technology, 6(1), 162–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaman, M., & Hasil, F. (2018). The evaluation of hydroelectric power plant (HPP) practices in Turkey from the environmental perspective. International Journal of Afro-Eurasian Studies, 3(5), 145–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, X., Zhang, L., Lan, J., Tongway, D., & Freudenberger, D. (2020). An environmental impact assessment of different management regimes in eucalypt plantations in Southern China using landscape function analysis. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 1–11

  • Zhu, C., Zhang, X., Zhou, M., He, S., Gan, M., Yang, L., & Wang, K. (2020). Impacts of urbanization and landscape pattern on habitat quality using OLS and GWR models in Hangzhou, China. Ecological Indicators, 117, 106654

  • Zotou, I., Tsihrintzis, V. A., & Gikas, G. D. (2019). Performance of seven water quality ındices (WQIs) in a Mediterranean River. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 59(3), 205–215

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Ilmur Energy Production Marketing Import and Export Limited Company for the topographic map, the forest management plan, the geology map, and the soil map, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry of Turkey for the metadata CORINE map.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Forestry, Bursa Technical University, A-316, Bursa, Turkey

    Sara Demir

  2. Department of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Fine Arts, Kırıkkale University, Kırıkkale, Turkey

    Öner Demirel

  3. Department of Forest Engineering, Faculty of Forestry, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey

    Arslan Okatan

Authors
  1. Sara Demir
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Öner Demirel
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Arslan Okatan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sara Demir.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Demir, S., Demirel, Ö. & Okatan, A. An ecological restoration assessment integrating multi-criteria decision analysis with landscape sensitivity analysis for a hydroelectric power plant project: the Tokat-Niksar case. Environ Monit Assess 193, 818 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-021-09573-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-021-09573-2

Keywords